• 4 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 6th, 2025

help-circle
  • No, a mutual fund with 1-2% MER is not the same as an ETF with 0.25% MER. One of them steals half your money while the other does not.

    it would be stupid for a bank to promote and sell investments that purposefully underperform

    1. Nobody said purposefully. It doesn’t need to be purposeful for the stats to play out returns are lower for active management.
    2. I just explained how there are literally massive financial advantages to them selling these funds.

    Believe it or not it is very financially lucrative to drain up to half of people’s retirement funds while disguising it under opaque language they know people won’t understand (like MER, brokerage fees) while “”justifying”” their fees with hopes that they would outperform the market (which they don’t).

    Sorry to break it to you but your parents were raised in a world where we had less data on these things. We now know their work over the years drained people of their money and siphoned it up to banks.

    They didn’t need to be conscious of it for that to be the effect. That’s simply what happens. And because these are risk adjusted opportunity costs people don’t know better.

    Moreover your parents worked in a market when 0.25% MER All in One ETFs didn’t exist. So it’s a moot point.



  • It is terrible advice. And it’s less terrible than advising them to go to a bank.

    I’m sorry but you’re misinformed. When you walk into a bank and ask for financial advice those employees are NOT liable in Canada nor are they required to have full certifications.

    They have no fiduciary duty to you and in fact they are PUNISHED for not scamming effectively or often enough for the banks. They have performance quotas to meet that are misaligned with their customers interests.

    Pay for someone who is actually qualified.

    As for why 1-2% MER actively managed funds pushed by banks can drain roughly half of your retirement savings there’s tons of info out there on how compounding effects work and the downsides of active management.

    I encourage you to go pay for a qualified financial planner. It sounds like you’ve been lead astray.

    other than the broker fees

    EXACTLY. Do you know what compound interest is?


  • Yes necessarily. If you have the ability to determine whether they’re pulling the wool over your eyes then you might as well just advise yourself at that point.

    Even the internet is often a better place to get advice than an advisor at a Canadian bank who’s job performance is intimately tied with how efficiently he can scam you.

    Also, I didn’t say independent financial advisor. You should also not go for advisors who are independent but charge some management fees in exchange for controlling your investments. I said flat fee financial advisor.

    A flat fee financial advisor isn’t going to sell you a scam mutual fund with 2% MER or advise you to take out a large debt you will not benefit from. They are paid by you and accountable to you with no authority to skim off the top of your assets. Those mutual funds you say are fine often rob people of half their retirement savings over the course of decades due to compounding effects.

    You want to get advice ideally from those who have a fiduciary duty to YOU such that their interests are aligned with yours. Failing that, you want someone who has no stake in your money.







  • None of your business, frankly. Those are our genitals and we’re human beings not medical curiosities.

    Asking us to defend publicly that our genitals are “good enough” by deep diving into the details of how a very complex and advanced surgery is done is utterly dehumanizing behavior. Anyway, I’ve literally never had a man say he felt there was something off with my genitalia and that’s including men who I never disclosed to & later asked me about pregnancy risks (implying they still believed I was cis). So this person is utterly misinformed and frankly speaking out of his ass.

    Don’t ask again. Be kind and respect people’s privacy when the topic is about their genitalia. Thanks.







  • We should be explicit about some things:

    • It is the project of capitalists & the new regime to divide and conquer Canada by stoking the flames of western alienation
    • Danielle Smith is merely the next step in a media pipeline that we’ve unfortunately allowed to progressively rot our country for the past 20 years
    • She is openly admitting to the fact she incited a foreign leader to interfere in Canada’s sovereign elections
    • The everyday people of Alberta are not to blame for this situation—their disillusionment and vulnerability to grifters like her did not come from nowhere
    • When fascism rears it’s head, the working class must band together, and that includes reaching out to Albertans

  • Bayesian@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldHiring is broken
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Tell me you know absolutely nothing about the work we actually do without telling me huh.

    The top level comment is about AI development not AI use.

    Speaking as someone with more than a decade of experience developing AI: prompting ChatGPT to write your cover letter for an AI dev role is at best neutral to your ability to perform the job, at worst a sign of total incompetence.

    It’s fucking funny to me how every two years people dream up new and novel ideas of what it is we do based off nothing but vibes lmao