Most CEOs don’t get those perks btw. Most CEOs aren’t millionaires. The CEO of the company I work for isn’t paid millions.

But besides, even with all the luxuries in the world, it doesn’t stop the job being stressful. Being a leader of a country comes with a lot of perks, but it’s still a stressful job.

Okay…? Clearly some jobs are more stressful than others though.

And the October the 7th was just a friendly little fight was it? Oh no, that was genocide.

You also realise not all CEOs earn stupid money? The CEO of my company with about 100 employees certainly isn’t earning millions. It also doesn’t matter how much you get paid, a stressful job is still stressful.

That wasn’t what I meant, and you knew it. Well done!

No calls for genocide please.

You don’t have to make the public domain, well, public. You can not hook up any DNS records for it, so externally it won’t resolve anywhere and just use internal DNS.

Doesn’t make the job less stressful though?

They got fired in both WeWork and Uber…

They often do get fired, yes. See WeWork or Uber.

I’d just buy a single domain, it’s like £5 a year and use a letsencrypt wildcard and have it auto renew via DNS challenges. Very easy. You can do what you’re doing with letsencrypt, but you’ll have to set up HTTP challenges for each sub domain, or DNS challenges for each sub domain. Obviously doable, but more work.

Doing it without letsencrypt and just doing it privately? I dunno if I’d bother with that, firstly you’ll have to go through the hassle of making sure any browser and computer that connects to it has the root cert of the private CA, or you’ll get self signed errors, which is a faff. I’d honestly just pay the £5 or so a year, you’ll spend more time (and time is ultimately money) doing it without it.

I dunno, being a CEO is a stressful job, the buck stops with you ultimately. Yes they’re paid very well, which counters this a bit!

It depends on your definition of transphobia. If your definition of transphobia is hateful comments against trans people, then yeah, sure. If it includes people who want to debate the climate, such as bathroom issues, pronoun discussions etc, then no. That’s just censorship and not allowing debate.

Same with GRT, actual racism against them, sure, ban it. But that shouldn’t be used as an excuse to stifle discussion around real issues. If a GRT community are illegally camping on land, then that’s a crime and it’s not racist to point it out.

Like everything in life, it’s nuanced.

Personally, I think only nasty personal attacks on others and actual illegal speech. I don’t like censorship, I think censoring opinions just pushes people to echo chambers. You may not agree with GC people, for instance, but deleting their comments just end up with people like Graham Linehan, stuck in their own echo chambers getting more and more extreme.