ObjectivityIncarnate

  • 0 Posts
  • 535 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2024

help-circle





  • Both 2024 and 2016 were total punts by the Democratic party, elections that could have easily been won in large margins, but defeat pulled from the jaws of victory in a way that seemingly only they can.

    People know if they live in battleground/swing states. And still, the fact is that despite Trump getting FEWER votes than last time (which is an election he LOST, by the way), he WON this time, simply because millions of blue voters in those key states decided they’d rather not vote at ALL, than vote for the Democrats’ candidate.

    There is no excuse for the results of either of these elections, honestly. It’s fucking embarrassing.


  • If you truly believe that it is naive or ignorant to have a problem with any individual hoarding

    Well, here’s an example of the ignorance I was referring to: no billionaire is “hoarding” anything. Their net worth comes from the value of their investments, investments into businesses that function within the economy. And investing into a business, and in turn owning a piece of it, is absolutely not “hoarding” that piece. To define it that way would be to define that owning anything equals “hoarding” it.

    Ownership and hoarding are not the same thing. The fact that I have something you don’t doesn’t mean I’m “hoarding” it. That is a ridiculous notion.

    so much wealth that they could solve just about any problem where money is the limitation

    You have zero perspective on just how costly those problems are, nor the fact that there is almost no major problem that an injection of funds can fix all by itself.

    The US government spends more each and every year than the net worth of every US billionaire combined. Over $1 trillion (which is ONE THOUSAND TIMES the amount of wealth that ‘qualifies’ someone as a billionaire) was spent last year on welfare programs alone.

    It’s just not as much as you think it is, in the grand scheme of things.

    I don’t think we can have a meaningful conversation.

    Until you become more familiar with the facts of the matter, I definitely agree.














  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.worldtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksIn a world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Linking to my entire profile and repeating your lie doesn’t cut it. Cite me. Cite a single sentence of me praising Trump. Quote me.

    You can’t. Admit it, liar.

    The grand irony is that just yesterday, I told a friend that even if Harris does win, if it’s not a blowout, I’m still going to be kinda pissed, because there should be no fucking way Trump should even come close to winning this election.

    The electoral map should look like blue Reagan.

    But no, because I have actual morals and values and don’t suddenly become okay with dishonesty based on who the target is, your simple binary mind just can’t conceive of me being anything other than one of the ‘bad guys’ on the ‘other team’.