A software developer and Linux nerd, living in Germany. I’m usually a chill dude but my online persona doesn’t always reflect my true personality. Take what I say with a grain of salt, I usually try to be nice and give good advice, though.

I’m into Free Software, selfhosting, microcontrollers and electronics, freedom, privacy and the usual stuff. And a few select other random things, too.

  • 8 Posts
  • 1.77K Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2024

help-circle
  • Auf meiner kleinen Ein-Personen Instanz hab ich die auch schon längst alle gelöscht. Vielleicht wäre es sinnvoll ein Bugreport / Feature-Request zu schreiben, dass man soetwas in Zukunft irgendwie archivieren kann. So dass es für die paar Leute, die das wollen noch existiert, aber überall ausgegraut wird oder aus den Ergebnissen entfernt wird. Und außerdem die Optionen zum posten oder abonnieren entfernt werden.



  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.detoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldWhich case is Pi-hole for?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I get a lot of ads everywhere. And trackers. On most of the news sites, social media platforms, my email provider, .places where I look up information, … The majority of the internet is commercial and financed through advertisements. With few exceptions, like personal/indie blogs and places like this one. I mean if you read just blogs and Wikipedia, you might already be alright. But that’s not how 99% of people use the internet.

    Yeah, Youtube ads won’t be blocked by a DNS blocker. You need a browser plugin for that. I use Firefox, uBlock and Sponsorblock. That removes most of the ads everywhere, including Youtube.




  • I’m not part of that “community” myself. But I’ve heard some creators want to stay in control where which pictures of them are accessible and how long, etc. I mean we’re talking about amateurs here, not professionals. Their situation might change, i.e. life, getting kids, new partner… And they might want to quit entirely. They should be allowed, And not have their pictures kept around by third parties. Which isn’t possible if we copy them to several other places. And they have the copyright. They might even want to advertise for short periods of time, or reconsider and delete some pictures they’re not comfortable with (any longer). Or advertise in a well-defined community and not like “more exposure” than that.

    And a big issue is copyright violations. Quite some pictures on Reddit aren’t uploaded by the creators themselves, but uploaded by other people, without the depicted person’s consent. For example stolen from OF, Discord… Or re-posted from some dude’s harddrive. We can’t just spread that around, either.

    I think giving people exposure, whether they like it or not is bad when it comes to nudes and sex. And even more so if we can’t even tell if it’s been uploaded by them and with their consent.






  • I think it’s a waste of time. It doesn’t really add anything. If you don’t want to lose your subscription in the unlikely event that your server/instance goes down forever, just use the export feature to make occasional backups. You can always create a new account after something happened. No need to invest that time otherwise.

    You’re free to use sockpuppets though. Or if you’re moderating stuff or participate in instances/communities who don’t federate.







  • Sure, go ahead. Technically it’s not 100% correct. I mean lemm.ee wouldn’t be your provider, it’d be the people operating the server who provide the service to you… But I think it’s close enough. Only issue I can see is the term “provider” usually being used with commercial services. Like a cellphone provider or ISP. So I’m not sure if people start to think this costs $10 a month or something and is run by for-profit businesses… But we also use the word “provider” for free things, so I’m not entirely sure about that. But generally speaking I think we use different terminology because we don’t think of the Fediverse as a product.




  • Well, they learn from the training material and then they apply what they learned. That’s not exactly copying. Like me learning to code with textbooks and then being able to do it myself. LLMs are supposed to do something similar, generally they don’t reproduce their training material verbatim. But it’s complicated. And I believe we have some court cases and the legal system needs to find out how to apply copyright. Plus the big companies just steal stuff. It’s not like me buying the books for university, Meta just downloads all of them via bittorrent. Which is definitely illegal. But i think the difference between learning, copying, being inspired by something is more nuanced. And if something like “fair use” applies, there isn’t much an author can do. I guess LLMs are able to memorize stuff as well. And I don’t think that is okay. I’m not sure if we have examples of that happening, that’d make a copyright case a bit easier.