Now you’re getting it, human fish fact would be far more technically correct than a cephalopod being there. But fish doesn’t have to be a scientific term, just like tomato and cucumber can culinarily be vegetables, so too can a cephalopod be a fish. Just not scientifically. https://youtu.be/hVjSJV0WoDQ scishow did a shorter video on the topic too.

My position is literally that of modern evolutionary biology. Fish is not really an accepted scientific term anymore because it doesn’t really mean much. Coelacanths are more closely related to humans than they are to trout, which are more closely related to you and me than they are to sharks. Dolphins, obviously being mammals are much more closely related to us like you said than any of those, but you still can’t not classify them as fish. Clint’s Reptiles is a great youtube channel made by an evolutionary biologist that does some good crash courses on the modern science if you want to understand it better.

Mammals are tetrapods yes, which fall under lobe finned fish.

Can’t evolve out of a clade. Dolphins, and all tetrapods, are lobe finned fish, and bony fish, and jawed fish, and chordates respectively. There is no clade that includes trout and sharks that does not include dolphins, nor is there a clade that includes trout and coelacanths or lungfish that does not include dolphins.

Dolphins are fish, they are Sarcopterygii, lobe finned fish. All lobe finned fish are more closely related to each other than they are to ray finned fish like trout.

Yes, that is how a war typically works. One side attacks, then another side counterattacks. Amazing.

Maybe if they spent more money making it a good experience that respects customers and developers alike and less on bribing platform exclusives they would be better?

Driving safety

I do this too, I’m the only one I know who doesn’t think it’s weird to do, I’m glad I’m not alone.

Mid 30s

Yeah you’re right, I’m only alone because Im garbage, thanks for that reassurance.

Way to not answer the question…

I have seen the way people drive if there are no consequences for driving terribly and dangerously. I assure you it cannot be fixed with just speed/red light cameras, speed bumps, and social programs. (And honestly, cameras and especially speed bumps just make the road worse for everyone)

I mean, I’m a taxpayer so kind of lol

Yeah, that’s a much more reasonable take, it isn’t what you said at first though.

You really are, the US is the primary funder and arms provider of the genocide in Palestine, it is a christo-fascist oligarchy built on multiple genocides and the two largest scale ethnic displacements in world history. Neither of which have had substantive reparations paid for. The state is actively in the process of in large part ethnically motivated murder, mass incarceration, mass displacement, family separation, torture, and placement in concentration camps. By your logic anyone working for that state is culpable and a legitimate target of political violence. Be logically consistent or get out.

You are basically advocating for murdering US postal and social service workers…

I dunno, the bus I drive costs more than double what that car costs.

High of 63 today where I live <3

As far as the written word of the law goes, this seems reasonable. It’s a 40 year old law at this point, it needs to be updated in a lot of ways. This has been on congress for a long ass time.