![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
you can model the tax on the supply or the demand. in most simple models the outcome is the same
you can model the tax on the supply or the demand. in most simple models the outcome is the same
technically yes, but the proof would usually show that this works by constructing the bijection of [0,1] and (0,1) and then you’d say the cardinalities are the same by the Schröder-Berstein theorem, because the proof of the latter is likely not something you want to demonstrate every day
even if that’s not how you can write it, one gets the same issue in yours subtracting infinity from both sides
it’s actually Vulcan
ah, but don’t forget to prove that the cardinality of [0,1] is that same as that of (0,1) on the way!
no, there aren’t enough integers to map onto the interval (0,1).
probably the most famous proof for this is Cantor’s diagonalisation argument. though as it usually shows how the cardinality of the naturals is small than this interval, you’ll also need to prove that the cardinality of the integers is the same as that of the naturals too (which is usually seen when you go about constructing the set of integers to begin with)
actually you can for each real number you can exhaustively map a uninque number from the interval (0,1) onto it. (there are many such examples, you can find one way by playing around with the function tanx)
this means these two sets are of the same size by the mathematical definition of cardinality :)
well yeah, there’s only so much sexy to go around. how else do you propose we save some for spiders?
j’imagine qu’on peut militer en faveur de la reconnaissance du concept, avec l’intention que ça change comment on conçoit nos politiques
you’re assuming they’re doing it by accident
schwarzer Freitag, bitte
that’s why he said: light years away
as in: there is still a great amount of distance Orban thinks Ukraine needs to cover before they converge with the EU admissions acceptability criteria
God, I can’t believe I just had to defend Orban
I like my potatoes raw thank you very much
every dollar you raise, the fewer customers you get. the point is that you should want to raise the price whenever the relative drop in customers is less than the relative increase in price to maximise profits (where marginal cost is marginal benefit :) )
I’m a little confused. Don’t we want this to be as transparent as possible to limit conspiracies?
deleted by creator
some injustices are structural
3rd panel, second shelf from the bottom
und Mallorca Majorca
I’m pretty sure he was involved with the liberation theology movements in Argentina before the previous pope clamped down on it (in his capacity as a cardinal)