Rechte Friedensdemos/ Braune Esoterik gehen auch in die Richtung. Auf Drrrogen kann sich halt fast jeder einigen.
Satiriker sind nun offiziell arbeitslos.
Hochwähli für Zettelschriftumkehrrealismus
The EU isn’t just one simple entity, it’s doing good things and bad things at the same time. Considering the recent election of the parliament, ‘security’-focused rethoric seems to resonate with the people.
To be fair, conservatives have been wanting this for a long time and this isn’t something entirely new.
Thank you. There’s nothing under the leaf and I already had the suspicion that it was caused by some water. nutrient burn is likely (soil availability was pretty screwed).
I think you nailed it, does this have an impact on the plant/ is there a way to treat the symptoms?
Obwohl das hier ganz positiv erscheint, will ich auf eine Marketingstrategie hinweisen, die damit zusammenhängt. Häufig nutzen Firmen eben ‘kontroverse’ Einstellungen, um in die Schlagzeilen zu kommen. Daraufhin erhalten die Marken dann Aufmerksamkeit (besonders von Andersdenkenden). Bei Keurig und Adidas hat das Prima geklappt. Vollidioten zerstören in Extremfällen Produkte als Boykott, was den Firmen nur hilft (mehr Nachfrage, da weniger Sättigung, obwohl Produkte verkauft wurden). Hier ein DuRöhre Filmerzeugnis dazu: https://yt.artemislena.eu/06yy88tLWlg?t=478
oh lol, den hatte ich irgendwie garnicht wiedererkannt
Helft einem Zuhausi aus: Wer ist das Rechts?
Ach was, ich wette die Gekte trommelt schon Truppen zusammen
Die meisten jungen FDP-Wähler, die mir über den Weg gelaufen sind, sind eher so auf Lindner-Linie. Junge Liberale sind sogar noch schlimmer :\
Stimmt schon, zum Glück gibts ja ne Schnittmenge (föderiertes Stürzr wann? - Fedlr) ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ
You must have misunderstood. I’m not trying to argue about that. I’m merely pointing out that context is very important and that the article lacks context when presenting that quote.
Please don’t assume that I’m claiming the article to be misleading. I am asking for other sources to verify the article. But until somebody provides useful sources/context/both, the article is just a catchy headline with little to support it.
If you fail to provide anything like that, I won’t assume this to be factual reporting of any kind. And as you are obviously very invested in this and I don’t assume any malice on your end, I believe you can help.
“Israel has the right to defend itself. The reality is that Hamas uses schools, hospitals, kindergartens as command centers and that the people in the Gaza Strip are also abused against their will as protective (human) shields,” government deputy spokesman Wolfgang Buechner claimed while speaking the press in Berlin.
Does anybody know of a source for that? This article gives next to no context and just seems to list vaguely related assertions and claims made by other media outlets.
Is Buechner specifically talking about the “strike on the Al-Tabiin school in Gaza” or just about the situation in general? This information is pretty important and leaving it out is potentially misleading.
Translation of parts from the German netzpolitik.org article:
Other states also reject the current proposal. Six states "stated that they could not agree to the proposal due to fundamental concerns.
[…]
The Legal Service of the EU member states supports the critics. Last year, the experts came to the conclusion that chat control is contrary to fundamental rights and will fail in court. These concerns have “still not been dispelled”. The lawyers also believe “that the proposal would not stand up to judicial review” - i.e. it is illegal.
[…] If either France or Italy - or two states from the Netherlands, Belgium and the Czech Republic - reject the new proposal, there will still be no majority in the Council.
[…] The Hungarian Council Presidency is sticking to its optimistic timetable. Hungary actually wanted to “further negotiate the proposal at a technical level”. That would be the Council working group on criminal prosecution. It met today, but did not discuss the chat control. Instead, the advisors for justice and home affairs are to negotiate the Hungarian proposal on Monday. If Hungary has its way, the Permanent Representatives will then decide on the Council’s position, followed by the Justice and Home Affairs Ministers on October 10. France and Sweden are “explicitly” in favor.