and now they’re cool again 🤯
i would like to be able to send back these 20 y.o to 80s for a week to see if they still think it’s cool
i guess 20 y.olds of now don’t use the word cool?
/s
notated as ∨
“constant performativity, brand management, status seeking” ;P
☞ “Information wants to be free”
and now they’re cool again 🤯
i would like to be able to send back these 20 y.o to 80s for a week to see if they still think it’s cool
i guess 20 y.olds of now don’t use the word cool?
looking at the illustration, i was thinking the same. These shouldn’t have been accessible to 7 y.o. me
I’ve “read” them all 🤷
it’s better now
if one ignores the reflected horizon :/
a familiar face from signal stickers
https://signalstickers.org/pack/20ede9fcca6d62c19170a19263a9ecb6
https://signalstickers.org/pack/62e9afbd85d381b43d3fd6dd74411f56
you’re welcome
anarcho-communists were always too communist for my anarchist tastes. Let’s part ways, nothing would come of our pseudo conversation.
where did you get these numbers? Are they national or global?
psychology, psychiatry, hospitals and of course what you may call “psyche wards” (among many other subjects)
the question of when we started to establish psychiatric institutions; who did we incarcerate in them and with what justifications. If this and similar subjects interest you, there you have a person who spent their life examining them.
see, i’m not a rambling lunatic 😁 i had to ask myself so many times these same questions and i’m sure i will be asking them again 🤷
why go to extremes? Let’s say a thief? An alcoholic who gets aggressive every time they’re drunk? A man who beats their companion? Or a woman who beats their companion? A dog that shares the same space and bites your friends. A woodchuck in your garden?
“collectivity” may establish rules but people who are sharing the same spaces, with or without similar world views, have no obligations to follow these rules. Solving these kinds of problems while trying to respect anarchist ideals are not as easy as you think.
Communists are more comfortable with these kinds of solutions. One shouldn’t confuse the two (while there, of course, is an expansive common ground called anarcho-communism)
are you familiar with Foucault’s work?
calling for help of people who are experienced in dealing with these kind of situations, without using pejorative names for their profession, would be reasonable
as an anarchist living on a state controlled territory, you need not feel guilty about communicating with the police
you’re writing that in your anarchist society there would be a “psyche ward” where people deemed dangerous by the society would be incarcerated.
Is that correct?
most anarchisms (again the plurality) have problems with the community imposing choices over individuals.
justification of this or that as “better” or “worse” are personal or communal choices (and it shouldn’t surprise you to find an “anarchist community” with despotic tendencies. Unlike theory, flesh degenerates with time 🤷
it is relevant, as every society has its own solutions to “safety”
if you’ve visited anarchist communities, you’ve probably seen that they invented their ways of dealing with “problematic” individuals
they were all on different subjects but 👍
also, what kind of an “anarchist society”?
put 10 anarchists together and you would have 10 different visions of an “anarchist society”
What makes you think that a “psych ward” would be an acceptable solution in an anarchist society?
confinement would still be involuntary and an imposition.
they need electric six as friends