ये हंगाम-ए-विद-ए-शब है ज़ुल्मत के फ़रज़ंदो,

सहर के दोश पर गुलनार परचम हम भी देखेंगे,

तुम्हें भी देखना होगा ये आलम हम भी देखेंगे

– Sahir Ludhianvi

  • 3 Posts
  • 64 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: March 13th, 2025

help-circle




  • There are more slaves today than there were during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade (not counting indentured servitude, which was abolished only in 1917~1920 by the country that prides itself on ending the slave trade. Not counting serfdom either). Kevin Bales wrote a book on it - ‘Disposable Peoples.’ Salty libs downvoting the comic would benefit from some reading. Read ‘Cobalt Red’ by S. Kara while you’re at it too.

    Liberals are so efficient when cracking down on communists, purging them with ruthless efficiency from both the public sphere and the government then why do they go soft on fascists who abuse free speech with some silly milquetoast excuse? It’s so obvious.










  • entoptic blue field phenomenon

    Thank you. You’ve solved a mystery that bugged me since forever lol. Yay, I am not crazy. I legit thought there was something wrong with my eyesight all these years, or that they were just weird floaters. Thank you so much, friend. Relate hard to the sound stuff as well, it’s nice to know it happens to other people al well.


  • Non violence is easy to ignore. First it starts with, ‘Don’t destroy public property.’ Then, it’s, ‘Don’t block roads.’ You get a handful of liberals acting in good faith against a system that always acts on bad faith unless forced to change otherwise. After that, it is, ‘Don’t cause traffic jams.’ All these rules sound fair but they’re designed to keep protests harmless, useless and easily ignored while normalizing such rules so that people are more repulsed by individual violence than state injustice. If you follow the rules, you accomplish nothing because tyrants don’t listen to others; if you don’t, you are a terrorist. Liberals concerned with the optics of protest thus take away the very thing that can save them as the definition of peaceful gets narrower and narrower.

    Violence is legitimate for legitimate ends. Power concedes nothing without a struggle.




  • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlsomeone teach them LaTeX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    According to this article, even the value of epsilon is wrong. Epsilon stands for ‘price elasticity’, which seems to measure how much tariffs would affect the price of an item. 0.25 is the value used by the White House, but some economists have come out saying it is actually closer to 0.945, indicating that prices are affected far greater by tariffs than what these buffoons claim. But even with the correct value, the formula makes no sense.

    Without the fancy shit, it’s basically (exports/imports) - 1.