You think that their cruelty only manifests towards women, LGBT people, children, POC, and migrants? Nope! They also relish the opportunity to inflict pain on animals. It’s also much more legal to kill animals, so when they get that hankerin’…

I mean, obviously? It’s over. You don’t leave your Christmas decorations up until next time 'round either.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: plastics are going to be the leaded-gasoline of our generation(s)

I’m glad it sank, because no one needs to have attack submarines, but hopefully no one was hurt.

It seems odd for it to be out of dry dock if it wasn’t complete?

Nice to see a court get it right for once, though I suppose they could ignore their advisor.

Cool? It was surfaced in a port.

Finding them when they’re docked in plain view isn’t the hard part, when it comes to submarine detection.

How can you have a “positive problem” with something? That seems like an oxymoron.

When it’s being employed properly, it’s absolutely an important tool, but the way they’re presented to most users, such as on-device biometric data stores (e.g. Apple’s secure enclave, or a TPM verification), aren’t the proper implementations. Nor is using biometrics as your primary auth method.

It’s supposed to be “something you have and something you know and something you are”, not “have or know or are”.

NIST standards for biometrics require the biometric data be stored on a secure remote server, and that the scanner device check against that during auth. Putting the biometric data on the device means that you’re losing a big part of your non-repudiation.

And it’s even worse when you’re using a secondary factor (biometric) as your primary or only factor (e.g. a phone unlock), that grants access to your other factors like password store and OTP tokens.

Biometrics are never supposed to be a single-factor auth method when used properly, but that’s how most people use them now, and it degrades their security.

If your phone requires a passcode, a TOTP grant, and a biometric scan, by all means, please do employ biometrics, but if it’s going to be your only factor, DO NOT.

Or, for simplicity to the average forum reader:

Never use biometrics. It’s just not worth the tradeoffs.

SF has the same general issue: there are a bunch of rich NIMBYs, old people, and closet conservatives who band together to elect center-right neolibs and cops.

There are tons of games that are playable on smartwatches. Apart from that, there are a lot of single watch-games from the past. McDonalds and BurgerKing have also had a lot of watches with games or toys, as well.

Tamagotchi watches came back in 2021, which is one great option.

There are a ton of retro LCD video game watches out there, but they can be pretty pricey.

Never use biometrics. It’s just not worth the tradeoffs.

Oh no! Anyways…

So many adults just want kids to be accessories to show off. They care more about what their acquaintances want, than what their kids want.

I think it’s several different things

1. a visual design aesthetic
2. specific gameplay mechanics
3. “legacy” systems and software

I think each of them can differ in whether they’re fixed or not. Generally I think that in game design, retro is fairly anchored when it comes to visual aesthetics and gameplay design. “Boomer shooter” mechanics and visuals, pixel art games, etc. I suspect we’ll still see those ‘retro’ games in 20 years, and probably not see e.g. Ubisoft-style open world control-point-capture games being called retro.

Consoles though, I do think shift into retro status very consistently. I think there are people who would even consider DS or certainly GBA games as retro already.

That depends on the license.

I have to keep track of our FOSS licenses at my job, and we have to avoid certain tools that feature licenses that do actually require upstream contribs. They usually only specify this as a req for commercial use of the tool, as a way to prevent someone taking the FOSS tool, adding new functions, profiting off the free work, and giving nothing back.

The Reciprocal Public License is one example.

Don’t ever take media for granted. Back up everything yourself, and make it available to whoever you can.

Politicians want to ban books and other media they dislike, and attacking “pirated” and “obscene” media is part of that path.

Internet Archive thought that by being a legitimate org, they could avoid the anti-consumer, anti-education media-hoarding and denial of companies and the government, but the reality is that individuals were always going to have to be the ones to save media ourselves.

Nah, they would just admit they were only ever in it for political power and authority, and become warlords, or a police state like us.

Here’s hoping this reverses, and that the reversal continues to accelerate.

“First they came for the women…”

So is CNN going full “we’re actually just entertainment” now?