• 8 Posts
  • 119 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle



  • I am with you regarding the big ones. But what about smaller media outlets and journalists to try to make a living on their own ? We need them. More then the big ones. Then the solution is to just ignore all the big ones and read the smaller ones. With ads or paying for it.



  • vapeloki@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldAds
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    We didn’t care. We were the hosting provider nor the news outlets. But we had close contact to our customers. And a lot of the smaller customers had a hard time to even survive. The primary source of income was print until paywals came around. Some customers never had print and had to close down with the surge of ad blockers


  • vapeloki@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldAds
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    That is true and false. Adblock plus takes money for the acceptable afs program, yes. But there are clear guidelines about the ads. Containing criteria for privacy, size in relation to content and more.

    I work in IT for 20 years now. Half this time my salary was paid for by ads:

    My company hosted big german news outlets. All money they made online was from ads.

    More adblockers meant less income so their required more ads just to come out without losing money.

    ABP tried to break this cycle.

    Now we are having paywals, and paywal breakers. And at this point this is outright stealing.

    If adblockers would allow ads that adhere to the acceptable ads criteria, the world would be a better place. Less paywals, less ads and maybe some companies would pay their employees a little bit more.




  • In theory yes. We are lacking the wallbox for now. We moved just a few month back, and while there is a solution to get the energy paid if I charge at home, I would have to buy a wallbox for way to much money from the payment provider we use for charging. There I would pay around 5k€ for a 22kW wallbox. And this box can not be used for other cars.

    But: My gf ordered her Cubra Born some weeks back. And a wallbox for ~1000 with it.

    I can see the prices my employer pays for my charging. On the most expensive chargers, the costs would be roughly the same as for a Diesel. On some reasonable priced chargers it gets way cheaper.

    But keep in mind that we have extremely high gas prices compared to the US. We tax our diesel and gasoline with a “steering tax”, as the lawmakers want citizens to save on gas, and reduce CO2 emissions.

    If I would charge at home, we could get a second contract with our electricity company, with about half the usual price per kWh for charging only.









  • Anyway, the US is stuck with American voters. So I’m glad our election system enforces patience.

    I take that ;)

    But srsly, it is not voters or voting system. It is both.

    Imagine there would be a MAGA party with equal chances like the Reps, how would that change the policies of those parties? And would this influence the voters behavior? That is not a rethoric question, it is a thought play. I, as an outsider, would assume that the extreme right wingers would unite under the MAGA flag and their policies would adapt accordingly while the Republicans would go back to their kind of normal.



  • He got abortion rights overthrown, handled the pandemic so badly, that the rest of the world laughed at the US, and got himself and his family richer by talking money and presents from foreign powers.

    Your argument boils down to: in the US political system it is hard to change anything and therefore we are protected from “worse”? Does this argument still stand with the supreme court ruling about presidential immunity and trumps statements about dictator on day one or “you never have to vote again”? Project 25?

    So, in my country we are moving towards a livable feature for citizens, in your country you are stuck with a system that only benefits the wealthy. And every approach that could change that will be undermjnedby right wing lunatics and their donors.


  • In the US the fucking right wing has 50% in the polls. What are you talking about?

    ~50% of the people ate voting for a lying, narcissistic Nazi. One of your supreme courts justices took "presents " from someone who has a hitler singed version of “Mein Kampf” in his possession. Right besides ohter Nazi memorabilia.

    And your concern is, that it would be easier for a right wing minority to gain power? You have a right wing majority.

    We ate shoked over here in Germany that our far right has more then 20% in election results. Your far right has 50% and one of your presidential candidates represents them.