• 420 Posts
  • 384 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle

  • Given rideshare driver (is this relevant?) this smacks of driving while black type discrimination.

    I think you’re on to something here. Any behaviour becomes 10x more threatening to the public/cops when the person doing it has brown skin.

    Obviously the toy looks a bit real, but it seems to me all this needed was “hey we had a complaint, that looked real, why not hand it over and go home for a bit?”

    Thing is, he’d already left the scene when he was arrested. They had to track this guy down to arrest him and confiscate his property, and it’s not even clear that he was breaking any law. Seems like they would have had time to check that?

    I also don’t know why they keep saying it was “discharged” like that’s a relevant detail. It’s not like it made it more threatening, because if you see someone pull a trigger and it doesn’t make a loud pop, then you know it’s not a real gun (or at very least it’s not a loaded gun). Unless this is a weird kind of water pistol that does make some kind of a pop? Also, if people are close enough to see the trigger being pulled then they’re probably also close enough to see the spray of water. It’d be far more effective to just brandish it if you wanted to scare people.





















  • Madison Avenue - Don’t Call Me Baby

    I had no idea this was Australian! Now you’ve mentioned it, though, there’s a noticeable lack of hard ‘r’ in some lines (for reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-mRcnF5tSc).

    Some classics in this list. Such a list can’t exist without people pointing out who was missed, though. This reads like a top 50 of what JJJ had on high rotation. It’s missing several acts that were bigger than most of the names on this list.

    Agreed - and thanks for making your list of things it omitted - but the list was compiled by a poll of Double J staff, so it was always going to be biased towards deep-cuts, and it’s a good thing to bring lesser-known and forgotten music to attention (so long as people don’t take the list to be authoritative).









  • “People who believe system is failing have less faith in system”

    I know it’s the headline writer, who I think isn’t usually the author of the article (I don’t know how The Conversation does it, though), and much less still is it reflective of worth of the study, but these kinds of headlines still annoy me. Maybe they’re written to annoy people, I don’t know.

    The headline isn’t even accurate. The question asked in the survey isn’t about whether respondents think inequality is high, but whether they think income distribution is fair (the exact wording is: “How fair do you think income distribution is in Australia?”).

    Department of Home Affairs Strengthening Democracy Taskforce

    This is a slightly terrifying phrase. I still associate Home Affairs so strongly with Dutton - as the mega-portfolio that was created to placate him - that it’s hard not to read ‘Strengthening Democracy Taskforce’ in the same way as American war-mongering rhetoric of ‘SPREADING FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY’.

    This impression is not helped by this bit of double-speak later in the article 😂:

    The Department of Home Affairs’ 2024 Strengthening Democracy report describes Australia’s democratic resilience as “strong, but vulnerable”.

    This suggests Australia’s satisfaction with democracy is at risk. It may erode further if voters think the major parties aren’t sufficiently responsive to the economic pressures they are under.

    Not to defend the state of our ‘democracy’, but I feel compelled to point out that thanks to preferential voting we can vote for parties other than the major parties. Unfortunately many of the minor parties are also in favour of policies that would increase inequality, but the Greens consistently campaign on reducing inequality. I suppose a lot of people who might be roughly characterised as ‘right-wing populists’ and against status-quo neoliberalism would find the Greens unpalatable, though. Do we need a party that’s like the Greens but with One Nation’s aesthetics or something?





  • Trump, unlike Biden/Harris, feels no need to pretend to be doing anything to stop Israel

    The pretending is in some ways worse.

    In practical terms Biden/Harris have given the Israeli government everything they wanted. Harris is participating in a genocide. Nobody should have voted for her.

    But the Biden/Harris Whitehouse paying lip service to humanity/sanity (including ceasefire) seems to have given a lot of people a fig-leaf to vote for a génocidaire, and more generally to go about their lives as if their government is not committing genocide.

    See also ‘kids in cages’. There’s a sizable number of Americans who, it seems, can only see the atrocities their government is committing when there’s a Republican in the Whitehouse.





  • I’m assuming you mean live streaming of the attacks on 7 October? Do you have a source for this? I can’t even find anyone claiming this.

    As far as I’m aware, the nature of the evidence against UNRWA staff (if there was any) was never made public. If there was live streaming, I think the Israeli government would never stop talking about it.

    In any case, there were accusations against 12 UNRWA staff. UNRWA employed 13,000 people within the Gaza Strip, so even if those unproven accusations were true, it would hardly be indicative of UNRWA being a ‘terrorist organisation’.