Me, too, so I only read the headline.

The alternative is not necessarily oil.

That’s not my point and I’m already aware.

One time? Wikipedia says over 100 serious incidents and lists about 30 of them. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents_and_incidents&wprov=rarw1

It’s fine if you like nuclear, just don’t try and claim it was one time. It poses serious risk and should be treated as such.

JNCOs are back in!

Kinda interesting that all the negatives apply to the larger industry of factory farming for meat, but because fur is out of fashion and a much smaller industry, fur farming actually faces consequences.

It is gross. I go into the community page of Fantazio to figure out why it needs double its size to update and all I see is bitching about the game being woke from some jerk named Fuhrer. But I also don’t know how you would begin to moderate so many forums across thousands of games.

Depends how short you are…

Dr Strangelove

Can’t wait to see what they do with it.

Double sweet.

It’s on purpose to make you wander more. Brief article about it.

I do not own a Tesla, but I have ridden in one without knowing this. This is not the fault of the passengers. This feature should be obvious to anybody in the vehicle, not something you have to rtfm for.

IANAL.

If it’s only the ten commandments, then it establishes that religion via display in government buildings. If there were other religions along side it, might be more wiggle room, but Satanists often challenge this by demanding a statue of baphomet be also displayed.

There’s tons of cases about this that make it very clear.

Do people still ask other people for directions?

I used to love the books as a kid and got to experience them again thanks to some android apps. Never know there was something like this, though.

If this is Gowrong, I don’t want to be Goright.

To the tune of Mashed Taters

It’s not the label that makes something a graph. Including tables and charts that are data but do not show a relationship into the things that support your conclusions is incorrect. You claimed to have a preponderance of evidence where what you had was one incorrectly interpreted graph. Do you understand why I called you out on that?