• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve never heard this before. Would you have an example? Because if so, I’m about to get a lot less grammatically correct.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      When someone says “you sure is” instead of “you are”, or wants to “axe” you a question, we are taught to consider them wrong. But they’re not. They’re just speaking a different dialect of English. Just like people from the UK call bathrooms “the loo”, and people from India say “do the needful”. There are loads of different dialect of English, and it’s racist to consider the “black” dialect stupid or incorrect. It’s not wrong, it’s just another dialect.

      It counts as a dialect when a significant number of people use a certain version of the language.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m getting the sense that correctness in language is a bit of a fool’s errand. It’s a relative term.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yep. Language is only as good as it’s ability to transfer information. English is a good language (IMHO), not because it has good rules to follow, but because it can be flexible in order to transfer new ideas. Want to steal a word from another language? Want to verb a noun? Want to create a new word by gluing two other words together? Want to add a new definition to an existing word? Yes, yes, yessir, and bet.