Whether you, like me, beleive that QAZWSX keyboards make far more sense, especially in a machine learning world, I think we all agree a layout designed to circumvent jamming typewriter keys doesn’t make sense in modern society on modern devices.

  • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    It makes perfect sense, we’ve been using it forever, it’s the standard, almost every person that’s taken a typing class for the last 150ish years (in the English speaking world), has done so on a qwerty keyboard. Why bother changing something that just works?

    • sabreW4K3OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just because you’re used to something, doesn’t make it good.

        • sabreW4K3OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Honestly, it’s a mere shower thought, so I didn’t come prepared with notes and statistics in hand, what I will say is the amount of screen real estate is by far the worst issue.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sure, and we’ve tried a lot of alternative layouts over the decades.

        None of them stuck around, by and large. Some have ultra-niche followings, sure. But overall, the latin-script world has stuck to (Q|A)WERT(Y|Z). For a reason!

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        True. But the rule of thumb is that in order to replace an existing working solution, a new model needs to be at least ten times better in quantifiable ways. Otherwise it’s worth staying with the established solution.

        What’s ten times better than qwerty?

        • sabreW4K3OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Have you ever tried to type on your phone in landscape while still seeing the content? That’s 8 times better in itself.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Have you ever tried to do this thing you’ll never actually need to do?”

            It sounds a hell of a lot more like you’re trying to automate text communication

            • sabreW4K3OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Wait, you’ve never had to type on your phone in landscape? Never played a game and had to type a message in chat? Never had to type while watching a video? Never had to do something in terminal and the text wasn’t legible in portrait? 🥹

              • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago
                1. no, 2) qwerty is fine for that, literally 0 need for AI interpretation, 3) no, not that I can’t just switch to a pc keyboard for 4) no
    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because touch screens are very different from typewriters and having to precisely press tiny keys without making full use of their capabilities is extremely inefficient.