• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    We talk more about their tactics than the message they’re trying to spread, so I don’t think we’re really discussing the things they’d want us to focus upon.

      • sabreW4K3OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think it needs to get to a point where the public put pressure on companies and inconveniencing them will force them to choose sides. I’m not sure it’s the side of common sense though.

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      We only discuss their tactics briefly when they do something dramatic and get on the news.

      When people hear about their tactics, ask why they’re going so far, and look into environmental issues as a result, I think that can have a much longer lasting impact.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And that’s where we disagree. I don’t think anybody is researching anything. The average person does not have the drive or attention span for a Step 2.

        Plus, I agree with their core ideology, yet I still think people who do this stuff are assholes, and I’m immediately annoyed on the outset. To expect people who aren’t invested in climate change to look past the “asshole” is a pretty big ask.