I don’t know if this is too self-promotey to put in the more serious subs so I’m putting it here. I need to blag being able to do the django framework so I spent a week fannying about with it to make this. Feel free to mess about with it, give feedback or repost it on reddit or any other lemmy knock-offs.

  • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is great, we need more of this. Now you just need TLSNotary for someone to be able to prove they have citizenship/are allowed to vote in that election.

    • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      The first step in my mental roadmap for making this more than a toy is going to be user accounts and magic links, so small orgs can manually vet people for local party branches and meetings. I’ll have to look into TLSNotary.

      • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Awesome, ya that’s a reasonable path, if you want to skip the manual review, you could use TLSNotary or ZKEmail (proof of email) to verify/validate TLS sessions or emails (basically checks that the email was validly signed by the email server from a sender, and you can selectively reveal that the person for example, paid a utility bill in London)

  • sabreW4K3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just a heads up. I got everyone in my house to vote and its only showing one ballot cast

    • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Sorry about that. Only way I could think to stop spam was to use IP as unique id. Try disconnecting from WiFi.

      Edit: if you’ve already voted, it overwrites that vote with the new one. This is just the quickest laziest way of stopping someone using a bot to skew the results.

      • sabreW4K3
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wasn’t .co.uk originally meant to be for UK companies? And with .uk available, it’s just easier to not have to type three superfluous characters.

        But all in all, there’s no correct answer. I was just curious, as it’s the first chance I’ve had to ask someone that registered a new UK based tld recently.

        • christophski@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think by the time .UK was available, people were already totally used to .co.uk so it’s still a bit jarring to use the new one

          • sabreW4K3
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh for sure. I don’t even see any websites trying to switch or even purchasing the .UK versions.

            It doesn’t help that we have no words that end with uk.

    • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Good point. I kinda rushed it and didn’t really think to check. Just bought it cause .uk is a better tld