Firstly I’m so sorry it’s an NST link - their news portal is infested with annoying ads that affects readability.
Secondly, I wish our journalists did the work to provide more context. Why is this an issue? What was the objection??
Firstly I’m so sorry it’s an NST link - their news portal is infested with annoying ads that affects readability.
Secondly, I wish our journalists did the work to provide more context. Why is this an issue? What was the objection??
It is just a move to gain popular votes from the people that are benefits from it, the Tabacco industry, the thousands of vape SME.
Maybe the government or the Ministry of Health should consider to impose law that if you are a smoker and or vaping on nicotine, you are not entitle for free/subsidized health care for life. The implementation can be as simple as using existing infrastructure like MySejahtera to register your smoking habit, you show your ID and scan every time your purchase a pack or any amount of nicotine, it aggregates the data and show the projection of the probability of your life expectancy, the more transactions the more less likely the government gonna lay eyes on you.
You made your decision to smoke, right ?
Thanks for the added context, that’s useful! I’m of a different opinion on the function of public healthcare though, thank you
Some additional contexts from Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye [1].
Long story short, the move is viewed as a giant-ass obvious eyesore trojan horse for the Generational Endgame Bill which aims to stop and prevent smoking and vaping among children and teenagers, our future generations.
[1] https://www.thesundaily.my/opinion/support-the-generational-endgame-bill-GK10927515
Wait, Trojan horse for or against? Based on LLT’s op-ed, he’s for the GEG bill.