Linux has made significant strides, and in 2023, it’s better than ever. However, there are still individuals perpetuating a delusion: that desktop Linux is as user-friendly and productive as its mainstream counterparts. After a few discussions on Lemmy, I believe it’s important to provide a clear review of where Linux falls short as a daily driver for average users.

EDIT: can I just make it clear I don’t agree with this article one bit and think it’s an unhinged polemic?

  • vapeloki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows is an industry standard. And so is office. As long as we treat it as such. If we want things to change we have to go against such standards.

    The big difference between Office and Photoshop is: Microsoft opened their file format. And has support for open standards.

    Adobe locked their eco system down to build a monopoly. This is not gimps fault. It is 100% on Adobe.

    While the outcome is the same, I would love to see a different wording: nothing is an alternative to Photoshop, because Adobe has a monopoly.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even with an open format MS Office and LibreOffice and others have compatibility issues. Microsoft keeps certain features kind of exclusive to their solution and then there’s the bigger picture called the Microsoft ecosystem. They are now very focused on that and that’s really hard to beat.