• Therealgoodjanet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can you imagine her outrage of anyone said that about any group she is part of? Women. American. Divorced. Military. You name it. “Kill all of them”, “How can you say that, that’s inhumane and you should be locked up in a mental hospital”, but when it’s Palestinians it’s fine I guess.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine thinking a whole group of people- millions of people- deserve to die. I can’t even comprehend the thought process there.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thought of killing millions of people is becoming normalized again.

      The more this rhetoric is repeated, the more likely it will occur … if not in Palestine, then somewhere else.

      We aren’t evolving at this point … we’re regressing.

      • perviouslyiner@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now that everyone who experienced WW2 has gone, the collective memory isn’t so strong. Up till a few years ago, you could talk to someone in the family who remembered it.

      • bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a bad take, you don’t have to have previously killed anyone to become a murderer.

        The Nazis managed to industrialize mass murder in the 20th century which directly reduced the amount of exposure to the common citizen. I don’t even want to imagine what a similar mindset would be capable of today.

        All it takes is a minority of psychopaths and a large population of apathetic citizens.

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ll have you know I’ve killed tons of chickens… in mine craft.

        Wtf I’m not killing a chicken. You kill the chickens. That can be your post apocalypse job. Me, I’ll stick mud peasant, thank you.

    • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The last bit you quoted about Biden is referring to statements he made about Biden asking Netanyahu about the possibility of a ceasefire and that Bibi told Biden there is none.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, there’s no possibility because he’s asked and was tolled no possibility.

          • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is the correct answer. There will be no cease fire until, at minimum, the hostages are released. The other problem that the Israelis have is that there’s no evidence that Hamas has any intention of honoring a cease fire as they’ve willingly violated many such agreements in the past.

            I don’t have a strong opinion as to what the correct choice is here for Israel, I’m simply stating the facts as they relate to the possibility of a cease fire.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      why tf is a state legislature even wasting time on this?

      they should be contacting their elected representatives in congress like anyone else.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only ones picking up the phones I imagine. You should attend a local school board meeting and listen to all the

        “This is state level policy”

        “I don’t care do something about it!”

        People are raising their concerns with the powers that be and they aren’t listening so they go find someone with some power and yell at them.

        And yeah this is not me showing contempt. I get it fully.

      • Unaware7013@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        If he wasn’t, he’s be called an antisemitic jew hater for daring question the Israeli narrative. Anything less than full throated support is akin to supporting Hamas according to a very large amount of stupid and/or intellectually dishonest people.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          You aren’t wrong, but he’s been ride-or-die for Israel for his entire career. He’s the most pro-Israel president we’ve ever had.

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Reagan was seriously pro-Israel and started the whole US-supported Israeli military funding. source

            Jen Kirby - You mentioned that the United States had a big investment in the Iron Dome. Why is that — what’s the US’s stake in this?

            Jean-Loup Samaan - Well, first, historically, the US started cooperating with Israel on air defense in the 1980s. So when missile defense became a significant component of defense investment in the US, Israel was very quickly involved. There’s a history of close ties between both countries in that field. So it would seem, in a sense, natural that a consequence of that is to support something like Iron Dome.

            I think it was around the end of Obama’s first term, in 2012, that the US put a stronger emphasis on Iron Dome in terms of budgeting. I believe it was probably not just the politics behind it, but also the strategic assessment that the priority is to protect and to strengthen the defense of Israel vis-à-vis these types of rockets.

            • jasory@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Started? How geopolitically ignorant are you? A considerable portion of the IDF’s armaments (including over 100 fighter jets) during the Yom Kippur War were flown in from the US. This was seven years before Reagan. The entirety of Israel’s existence has just been the US and France dumping weapons. (Israel didn’t indigenously make it’s nuclear weapons, they came from France’s nuclear projects, just like how the Kfir wasn’t built using Israel’s non-existent aerospace industry).

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I quoted a source. If you don’t agree with it, quote another.

                And please don’t call me ignorant. It’s rude and uncalled for.

                • jasory@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “I quoted a source”

                  I can smash on a keyboard and then write a citation to whatever nonsense comes. An intelligent person cross-references it with well established facts, and then decides if it’s probably true.

                  The idea that US support for Israel started in the 80s is refuted by hundreds of data points in Israeli history.

                  “It’s rude and uncalled for”

                  It’s totally called for. You could literally have read the Wikipedia on history of modern Israel and seen that it was patently false.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What do you think would happen to Israel if Biden came out and said “we will no longer defend Israel, everybody go nuts”?

              Lebanon and Iran and Qatar and Yemen and Iraq and Afghanistan and Turkey and Egypt and maybe even Russia would obliterate them. Israel is only able to exist because the US gives it unconditional support. Hence, the 51st state - an attack on Israel is an attack on the US.

              • SirVer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Lebanon and Iran and Qatar and Yemen and Iraq and Afghanistan and Turkey and Egypt and maybe even Russia would obliterate them.

                I have serious doubts as to the ability of some of these countries to be able to match up to Israel militarily, even aside from having other things to worry about at the moment - Russia in particular does not have the privilege of fighting two wars right now.

                There’s also the fact that Israel is a nuclear power - they almost used their nukes in the Yom Kippur war, which is what prompted the US to actually start resupplying them. If an Arab coalition were to attack Israel now (especially with Netanyahu in power), there is zero chance that they wouldn’t actually do it this time, and everyone knows this. No one in their right mind would try and pressure Israel to that extent, and most foreign powers would be highly motivated to do whatever it took to make sure that didn’t happen.

                Finally, if the US were to leave Israel alone, China would probably step right in to fill that void, and would be well-suited for it too, given that they have relatively good relations with most of the Arab nations (IIRC). So not only would the US lose a massive channel of influence in the region, they’d be allowing their largest geopolitical rival to consolidate their influence in the region as well - wouldn’t Biden be absolutely raked over the coals for that?

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  wouldn’t Biden be absolutely raked over the coals for that?

                  Ignoring all your speculation about Israel’s strength (I’m highly skeptical they could actually survive modern warfare - they have drone pilots, not infantry lol) he absolutely would. There’s a huge portion of the electorate that absolutely loves Israel and supports their genocide.

                  That’s not really a good reason to continue supporting them.

    • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are you diverting attention from the real issue: a fuckin’ psychopath calling for mass murder.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it’s all theater. Most of these loonies are extras they just don’t know it. It’s one giant distraction. A fuckin flea circus. Just make sure you’re paying attention so you don’t notice your wallet getting lighter or your rights getting smaller.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t say ignore them. That is how the loons get their soapbox and make rules that make our lives hell. Remember that it is local government that assists the state government with their gerrymandering and enforcement of abusive laws. Vote for competent, populace-minded local governments and the asshats in the state governments will have more trouble exerting will.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hope people are gathering outside her office to protest. What a piece of shit.

    Wait… subject == repub == POS? Ok, nm, that checks out.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is why I’m not all that concerned in the recent polls that Biden is losing support among Progressives, who tend to be sympathetic to the Palestinians. What are they going to do, vote for Trump and his friends, who are even worse? If Trump does win, do they really think they would be listened to?

    I doubt a single person in Florida who thinks that Biden and the party he leads is not taking their side on this issue would vote for this person instead.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could just stay home. Maybe a bunch of us are tired of voting for people whose only qualifications is they aren’t the other person.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But that’s entirely my point. These people who are complaining that Biden isn’t taking their side are at risk having an administration who considers them all to be terrorists to take over if they sit this one out. I suppose they can take solace in the fact that they stuck to their principles, even if the Trump Administration sends them all to re-education camps.

        Sometimes the perfect is the enemy of the good.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sometimes the perfect is the enemy of the good.

          There aren’t good options. There’s genocide lite and genocide delux.

          I will not vote for genocide, and if you vote for genocide you are complicit.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s a choice to not vote for genocide. You can tell yourself pretty lies, but if you vote for Biden you are a genocide supporter.

              • PowerGloveSoBad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Purposefully withholding your vote in the general election is a selfish/narcissistic act. No matter what wordplay you engage, not giving support to the lesser of two evils leads to better outcomes for the greater of them – and pain and suffering for the most vulnerable. But you get the comfort of hugging your pristine principles**

                **and La Revolución is NOT happening in time to help in any meaningful way before uncountable death and suffering – stop that BS and grow up

              • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                but if you vote for Biden you are a genocide supporter.

                Every time I hear this I have to do some math, play a word puzzle, or some other mental exercise to make sure I don’t catch The Stupid. If casting a vote for Biden equals support for genocide, then anything anyone in a civilized society does could be said to be the same. Vote for anyone? The joke’s on you, genocide supporter, you helped a different genocide supporter get elected. Do you go to work? You failed again; You’re making someone else money so they can vote for a genocide supporter. Do you pay Taxes, you genocide supporterfunder?

                Protest votes are for the primary; go ahead and vote for Gandhi McJesus then. The general is the team play. And if you don’t vote for the lesser of two evils you’re helping the larger evil get elected, you genocide supporter, it just lets you smugly deflect blame.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Vote for anyone? The joke’s on you, genocide supporter, you helped a different genocide supporter get elected

                  You can vote for people who don’t support genocide! They exist.

                  Do you go to work? You failed again; You’re making someone else money so they can vote for a genocide supporter. Do you pay Taxes, you genocide supporterfunder?

                  We are all complicit in our own ways and we have a moral duty to rebel against our genocidal government. Good job, you just made an argument for revolution lol

                  And if you don’t vote for the lesser of two evils you’re helping the larger evil get elected, you genocide supporter, it just lets you smugly deflect blame.

                  Democrats would oppose genocide if Trump was president, which actually results in harm reduction. How do you square that circle?

  • trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    She seems like an idiot, but the reality is anyone with this opinion out of Israel right now kind of has the right to feel that way. Genocide never fixes problems and always creates more problems later

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not too far of a departure from Biden’s statements about no upper limit of dead civilians or children and “None. No possiblity.” about a ceasefire.

    The real crime for the Republican: aligning with Biden in rhetoric.

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmings are rightly furious about these comments, but I don’t recall you all being upset about Tlaib’s tone-deaf implication that Israel should be wiped from the map.

    I’m not pretending Tlaib’s comments are as bad as these, because they’re not, but I am absolutely for censuring Tlaib over them. They were totally out of line, no matter what she meant.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      She called for Palestine to be free from the river to the sea. That doesn’t actually require wiping Israel off the map.

      Palestine and Israel could just become a single multi-ethnic democracy so everyone gets equal rights and equal protections.

      • Chatotorix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like saying “Black Lives Matter” is racist because the implication is that only black lives matter, when it is actually meant to say black lives also matter. Bad faith interpretation.

      • Tedesche@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        “From the river to the sea” is a phrase used by Hamas and other anti-Israel groups in the region to talk about wiping Israel out. I don’t think Tlaib was actually calling for the destruction of Israel, but her choice of phrase was absolutely moronic, and I don’t believe she ever apologized for it. That’s what I meant about her comments not being as bad as these, but still bad.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “From the river to the sea” is also a phrase used by the entire Palestinian resistance. Everyone, from peaceful protesters to violent militants, are saying the same thing- they are demanding freedom. The fact that some of them are more extreme than others is no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water. Even the ones that are anti-Israel aren’t calling for genocide - they want Israel abolished and all Jewish Israelis to become Palestinian.

          From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Deal. With. It.

    • Skolanthropy@champserver.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Lemmy did not levy these exact condemnations over a less-offensive comment and therefore…”

      What? So what? What is your point? You posted this just to side track condemnation of actual genocidal language in order to drop some open-ended whataboutism?