• Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Using a laser they could just as well send the cat. He would follow the laser just as well.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 months ago

    Bit annoying that they’re more specific about latency than bandwidth. The laser had lower latency than broadband, but I want to know if the laser had enough bandwidth to stream the video.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Lower latency than broadband…?

      If you’re getting >100s ping times you might want to have them come out to check your lines.

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 months ago

        Something tells me you’re not getting sub 100ms latency with broadband over 19 million miles

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean, if their point was that a straight-shot laser had lower point-to-point latency than a system with a bunch of non-direct links, intermediate switches, routers, mix of copper and fiber, etc… Well, no kidding.

          Didn’t say anything about 100ms though. I was guessing maybe they read 100ms though. Still not sure what the point was.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      "The video was then downloaded and each frame was sent to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, where it was played in real time. "

      It sounds like it. Laser comm can have some insanely high data rates due to the high frequency of the radiation.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    What strikes me is not the bandwidth achieved but the precision of the technology to aim the laser. 19 million miles is a great distance to successfully aim a beam of light. As this technology develops, real time communications with objects in orbit like around Mars will be possible.

        • paholg@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s really not at these scales. Earth and Mars go from roughly 4 light minutes apart to over 20.

          At the best case, saying something and then waiting 8 minutes for a response is hardly what I’d call “real time”.

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, it’s not slow, at all. It’s the speed of light.

            Unfortunately for us humans, we are a relatively fast form of life, when compared against the scale of our solar system, much less our galaxy, even when communicating at the speed of light.

        • Rosco@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s the fastest speed information can go through space, as far as we know. Unfortunately, there’s a lot of space. And a mean a LOT.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m wondering if we will need to tweak our Internet protocols to include interplanetary time? I would imagine mirroring would be much more important. Because light can only go so fast.

    • gens@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The beam is reeeealy wide by the time it gets there. Still a great achivement, though.

    • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I presume that we’re not yet concerned with what the Ansible tech awoke in the vast emptiness between, hmm?

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    Despite transmitting from millions of miles away, it was able to send the video faster than most broadband internet connections

    That guy must be a Spectrum subscriber

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    “We’re receiving coherent signals from the edge of the Milky Way.”

    “Life can exist in such isolation? What are they saying, do they need rescue?”

    “It’s a video of a small fuzzy animal.”

    “What?”

    “When we probed deeper to get more context, we found millions of such videos, supposedly they’re cherished non-intelligient companions and the people there wished to express that.”

    "…

    What?"

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Can’t wait til we can start watching interplanetary wars play out in real time.

      • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Can we have space settlement without the war and genocide? It’s not like killing Indians and robbing trains is a fundamental requirement.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That depends on if space is colonized by homo sapiens, or by an evolved form of ants, who rise up millions of years after humans have gone extinct.

          The civilization that evolved from ants probably could, as long as earth was ruled by a single queen, or matriarch.

          Humans? Doubtful.

          • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You are giving ants way too much credit. Those fuckers are brutal war criminals, the lot of them. Humans are bad, but we’ve had nukes for almost 80 years without glassing ourselves, ants wouldn’t last a day

            • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              No, because I’m assuming that one colony will wipe out the rest and earth will be ruled by the hereditary line of matriarchs of whatever the queen ant evolves into.

              They’ll probably enslave and brutalize all other species on the planet, but they’ll rule earth as a single unified colony, and space as an extension of that.

            • Promethiel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              They need to be harnessed into biological CPUs by hyper-advanced dog sized jumping spiders. It’s the only use for those murderous six legged maniacs.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Somewhere on my work wiki is a picture of puppies that I sent over SWIFT to a bank to test that the relationship was setup properly.

    Cats and dogs are always acceptable test messages

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago
    1. This is the correct use of technology. (But later let’s test the ping on Doom over laserlan)

    2. Taters is very precious!!

    • Promethiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Joke answer: It’s cute.

      Real answer: It’s cute and because of that broad appeal it’s easy good PR. NASA has to appeal to the populace to hope they demand their Representatives properly fund them.