• HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, maybe we should stop teaching people that everyone’s opinions are valid. That, and that there are people out there who want you to be uninformed/misinformed.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I just don’t understand how not stopping people from easily preventing deadly diseases helps Republicans. It’s their people getting the diseases and dying.

        I really don’t get them sometimes.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Reality is a threat to conservatives. Denying reality, in any form, weakens the arguments against conservativism. Claiming untruths is a quick and dirty way to determining who is in and who is out.

          Anyone out is the enemy, and therefore evil. Anything they do, say, or believe is evil because they did, said, or believed it.

          Anyone who is in is good. Anything they do, say, or believe is good because they did, said, or believed it.

          Some may die of preventable diseases, but that’s a sacrifice the conservative doesn’t even acknowledge because fuck anyone who isn’t me.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, but it’s a loss in terms of votes. You aren’t going to win elections if the people who vote for you are dying out because of what you are telling them to avoid doing.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you’re being nice, you’d say they’re contrarians.

          If you’re being not nice, you’d say they all suffer from oppositional-defiance disorder from decades of right-wing propaganda rotting their brains. Democrats say vaccines are good, therefore they must really be tools of the satanic child molesting one world government globalist cabal to steal our vital fluids and turn all of us into gay transgendered purple-haired soy-latte-drinking they/thems.

        • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Back in 1980, Isaac Asimov wrote:

          “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’"

          It is as true today as it was then. The only difference is that since the '80s, the Republican party has weaponized this cult and is using it to undermine our democratic institutions and they have been astonishingly successful of late. Their goal isn’t to get their base to get sick and die. The goal is to convince their base that the intellectual elite, the people trying to give them healthcare and lift them out of poverty, are really their enemy. If the GOP base starts respecting intellectualism and, God forbid, educating themselves, then the GOP would be doomed. An educated base would eventually notice that the GOP is curtailing their rights, ruining their environment, shortening their lives, and all but enslaving them and their children. If a small fraction of the base should die and fall off the voter rolls, then that is a sacrifice the GOP is willing to make.

          Personally, I had always assumed that such wilful ignorance would result in shorter lifespans for those cultists, and that a sort of unnatural selection would, if not end, at east manage the problem in the long run. But Trump and the pandemic have shown me that the cultists are able to out-breed even the most deadly effects of their ignorance.

    • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Politics is the side effect. Blame the media for all of it. This all started when the media decided they could increase ad revenue by prioritizing antivax grifters who lie about everything to sell their snake oil.

      If the media stopped promoting grifters, they would get less ad revenue, but humanity would be much better off.

    • freeindv@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s what happens when you take a shot that doesn’t prevent the spread and force it on people, like what was done to us over covid. It’s up to those who did wrong to rebuild the trust they abused

  • corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    The only person who should be able to “opt out” a child from vaccination should be a MD or DO, and they had better have a dammed good medical reason for it.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Doctors are susceptible to extremist indoctrination too. Just look at Frontline Doctors of America. They were aggressively pushing covid misinformation during the lockdown.

      Plenty of sham Doctors pushing addictive prescriptions like opioids too.

      People suck, regardless of education and career.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I disagree because doctors lie all the time about having a ‘good medical’ reason for things.

      Just look at how they all recommend routine neo-natal circumcision of males.

      Homosexuality was once considered to be a mental disorder.

      Lobotomies were once recommended treatment for ‘unruly’ wives.

      Appeal to authority doesn’t work when there are countless instances of that authority taking advantage of its position to exploit others who don’t know any better.

      I’m, of course, pro-vaccination. But it’s not solely because doctors recommend it.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you using “experts have learned new things and do not posses inherent omnipotence” as a reason not to trust experts?

        • hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t agree with them per se, but I think the point they are making is that you can find a crazy doctor who will agree with anything. Like if all you needed to get your kids out of a vaccination was a doctor’s note, there would be a well known doctor writing so many to all the home school parents.

        • chitak166@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          No. Doctors lie every time they recommend neo-natal circumcision with no underlying complications, for example.

          Go to different countries and you’ll see doctors lying about different things because it’s what the culture has deemed appropriate and acceptable.

          Are you trying to say that they’re always correct and we should treat their word as absolute fact? Or are you saying we should ignore the history of experts lying to exploit those who don’t know any better because there’s no chance it’s happening now?

    • scripthook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      11 months ago

      I disagree. As a parent it’s you’re right on if your child should or shouldn’t get vaccinated. Just like you have a right to reproduce. And unfortunately stupid people reproduce.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        No. Your rights end where other’s rights begin. You and your kids don’t have the right to get other kids, especially immunocompromised kids who can’t get vaccinated, sick because of your bad choices.

        This is not a freedom issue, this is a public health issue. Allowing unvaccinated kids (who are able to be vaccinated) into a school is risking others’ lives. You do not have the right to do that as a parent any more than Typhoid Mary had the right to keep spreading typhoid fever.

      • chulo_sinhatche@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        But you don’t have a right for your child to endanger someone else’s child. Obviously there is a blurry line there e.g., if my kid has a PB&J he might endanger the welfare of a child with nut allergies. Are we going to ban nuts? Probably not, because not enough kids can get sick from them to warrant that kind of action.

        Everyone’s kids can get measles. Or covid. Or polio. Or -insert preventable disease here-

        Therefore everyone’s kids should get vaccinated. I get that our government does shady shit sometimes, but people without any scientific background take that and then believe that vaccines are some huge conspiracy.

        It’s not.

        Science proves they work and do not harm you belong a tiny margin of fringe cases where people have severe side effects (like less than 0.1% of ppl).

        • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Actually, at school parents do get notified if someone in their child’s class has a peanut allergy, in which case the children aren’t allowed to have PB&J at lunch.

          • chulo_sinhatche@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I stand corrected! Just proves my point more though - even if a small population is at risk, we step in as a society decide that people should do/not do a certain thing that has the potential for harm.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If they’re going to public school, their decision affects all the other students. They don’t get to choose.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s a fine rationalization for private citizens in their private homes.

        The issue here is that these children are being sent to public schools and they’re interacting with other children. Sure, those children are likely vaccinated, but what about the ones who are immunocomprimised? what about the elderly grandmother picking her grandkid up from school one day? What about the ones that just get unlucky, and the vaccine isn’t enough to protect them?

        We let stupid people do a lot in modern society without consequence. Murder shouldn’t be added to that list. If parents don’t want to vacc their kids for stupid reasons, they should face the consequence of homeschooling them. If they want to be able to take part in polite society and send their anklebiter to public schools, then they must abide by the ground rules that are in place to keep everyone’s kid’s safe.