An attorney for Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, had urged the eight-person jury to “send a message” with its verdict.
Rudy Giuliani should pay a pair of Georgia election workers he repeatedly and falsely accused of fraud $148 million in damages, a federal jury said Friday.
The eight-person jury awarded Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, the sum after a four-day trial, during which they testified that Giuliani’s lies in support of former President Donald Trump’s bogus stolen-election claims subjected them to a torrent of racist and violent threats and turned their lives upside down.
Freeman testified Wednesday that she was terrorized by Trump supporters and forced to move from her home because of Giuliani’s smears. “I was scared to come home at dark, you know,” a visibly emotional Freeman said on the witness stand. “I was just scared, I knew I had to move.”
He’ll have to squeeze a whole lot of crude oil from his head to cover that.
I forgot about that whole Zorg moment he had on the podium
That was during the four seasons landscaping press conference. LOL
I’ve never seen a man so sweaty. He’s like the anti-Prince Andrew.
Breed them and produce an asshole in perfect homeostasis.
Who really really likes fucking kids.
Nine figures, baby. Suck it, Ghoul.
I’m sure #45 will gladly cover it for him, NOT. LoL
He doesn’t like losers checks 45s court cases in recent years lol. For a guy that doesn’t like losing, he’s not President, least for now. I truly hope people come out to vote again like last time. Not my country but it’d be nice to have stability for democracy from the country with the strongest military.
The dildo of consequences has finally arrived.
“After the verdict, Giuliani said he didn’t testify because he was worried the judge would find him in contempt, and complained that he hadn’t been allowed to enter evidence that his allegations were true, despite his not having turned over any such evidence before trial”
Just wow. Guess there’s a difference between what you’re willing to tell a reporter on the street and what you’re willing to tell the judge in court?
If I’m reading this correctly, Rudy had “evidence” but the court had ruled it inadmissible.
I mean, I have a document right now that says Rudy Giuliani is the zodiac killer. Signed by Jesus and everything.
Don’t mean it will hold up in court where there are procedures.
It’s the same in Trump’s trial. He was barred from using his “buyer beware” clause as an argument because it doesn’t hold legal water.
He acknowledged in his closing argument that “my client has committed wrongful conduct against” the pair and had “harmed” them, but asked the jury to keep in mind the good Giuliani had done in his lifetime.
He told them the message he believed they should send is, “You should have been better, but you’re not as bad as the plaintiffs are making you out to be.”
This has to be the worst closing argument ever. This might work if say, a teacher commits a drink driving offense, or a crosswalk attendant steals some laundry detergent, but “think of all the good” that this sycophant did in his life is just going to inspire heavier penalties.
But look at it from the defense’s perspective. He’s guilty AF and there’s no denying it. What play could that make other than to try a humanitarian appeal? It’s pretty clearly not going to work, but as his defense council they have to try.
I hope they get to seize his houses and they move in right away.
What play could that make
Oh I don’t know, perhaps contrition?
It was the only argument Rudy could make. He refused to provide discovery as part of an overall litigation strategy to hide his assets and got sanctioned with an adverse finding on liability. The only thing to argue to the jury was the amount of damages.
Someone should keep a running total of how much they all collectively will never pay.
Alot!
Huge! Bigly!
Can somebody familiar with the US legal system explain how these massive damage verdicts work?
- Are they proportional to the publicity of the offence, the wealth of the parties? I’m happy it happens to Giulani but it doesn’t make much sense to me… It seems hugely excessive for this kind of offence
- Does anybody actually expect anyone to pay that amount?
From the reporting I read, the huge cost is driven by the need for a ‘counter-messaging’ campaign to debunk the existing, repeated libel committed by Rudy. Given how his words were broadcast wide and often, the claimants will have to basically keep a PR team employed for several years until her name is restored or forgotten - which is very expensive.
There’s absolutely the usual pain and undue suffering award as well, but that’s not what ballooned this judgment
There was threats against them also right? So maybe relocating, some kind of on-call security or something, IDK.
Juries have a LOT of discretion regarding damages in civil cases. The damages are what the 12 jurors say it is.
The actual damages is how much money would it reasonably take to undo the damage done to the wronged party.
Pain and Suffering is compensation for the distress the damage caused
Punitive damages are a way for the jury to punish the accused for the moral repugnancy of what they did
To your point about being expected to pay that amount:
Ken Frydman, a former spokesman for Giuliani during his 1993 mayoral campaign, told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “The Lead” that while it’s not likely Giuliani will be able to pay the entire judgment, “it sends a message and sets a precedent for the other defamation cases.”
for defaming two Georgia election workers
Ladies and gentlemen, “America’s Mayor”
What is the impact of this? It seems like whenever a political person is hit with a huge fine in the US, they never pay a penny of it. And furthermore, it seems like they just live their life in luxury, untouched by the massive amount of money they owe.
I just don’t understand. In other countries, I’d expect the criminal behind bars - especially if they won’t pay. What kafkaesque bureaucratic shithole set of laws allow this?
That would be an interesting metric. “Republican deficit” - the sum of money owed by individual Republican agents (politicians and ex-politicians) through civil suits. Compare it to the “Democratic deficit” and see what kind of numbers we’re talking.
It’s civil and against him personally, he’ll be paying it or they’ll be back in court seeking additional damages. Criminal law is different and yes oftentimes the government will accept a small percentage of what’s actually owed usually 20%-ish.
The only way to answer this question is to investigate the circumstances of specific examples.
Generally, the person just doesn’t have the money. If Giuliani bought his nephew $100m in shares 10 years ago, who’s to say those shares do not in fact belong to the nephew.
Then why not start seizing his assets? Take everything from him
Interest starts running at 5.39% from the day of the judgment. It also operates as a lien against any real property Rudy has in the judicial district.
Rudy will likely appeal and the appeal operates to stay the judgment. Only after the stay is lifted can the plaintiffs move to execute the judgment, which can include garnishing wages, levying bank accounts, and direct asset seizures.
Donny will surely cover this expense, right?
¯\(ツ)/¯
👏
Suck on that, you bitchass trick!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
WASHINGTON — Rudy Giuliani should pay a pair of Georgia election workers he repeatedly and falsely accused of fraud $148 million in damages, a federal jury said Friday.
The eight-person jury awarded Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, the sum after a four-day trial, during which they testified that Giuliani’s lies in support of former President Donald Trump’s bogus stolen-election claims subjected them to a torrent of racist and violent threats and turned their lives upside down.
Their attorney, Michael Gottlieb, said in his closing argument that Giuliani had “no right to offer up defenseless civil servants up to a virtual mob in order to overturn an election.” He urged the jurors to “send a message” with their verdict.
In his opening statement, Giuliani attorney Joseph Sibley said a large verdict would be the “civil equivalent of the death penalty” for his client.
He acknowledged in his closing argument that “my client has committed wrongful conduct against” the pair and had “harmed” them, but asked the jury to keep in mind the good Giuliani had done in his lifetime.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in August found Giuliani liable for defaming the pair after the defendant repeatedly snubbed court orders to turn over required evidence to Freeman and Moss.
The original article contains 510 words, the summary contains 209 words. Saved 59%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This will unfortunately probably be settled for pennies on the dollar after appeals and such.
Damn ! He got that kinda money? I think I might run for Parliament. Need to do some research first. I’ll be back. Please vote for me.
sucks to suck traitor!
