I wonder how this will go down in court. It clearly says “person” and the money was paid to a corporation. Trump’s businesses aren’t holding any office, therefore the constitution wasn’t violated. They’re arguing that the presidency isn’t an office (CO ballot case), so if they win that it seems likely SCOTUS will drop a nuke on the emoluments clause too.
According to Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, Corporations are people. So lets put it to the test. If you can give unlimited campaign contributions to a PAC through a corporations, than a corporation, and it’s executives, would equally be liable under the law for violating the constitution.
I wonder how this will go down in court. It clearly says “person” and the money was paid to a corporation. Trump’s businesses aren’t holding any office, therefore the constitution wasn’t violated. They’re arguing that the presidency isn’t an office (CO ballot case), so if they win that it seems likely SCOTUS will drop a nuke on the emoluments clause too.
According to Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, Corporations are people. So lets put it to the test. If you can give unlimited campaign contributions to a PAC through a corporations, than a corporation, and it’s executives, would equally be liable under the law for violating the constitution.